ARTICLE: French Pool Bans Muslim Woman for 'Burquini' Suit

I personally was appalled at this. I feel very strongly that she has a case for religious discrimination and I hope she pursues it as far as she can.

"PARIS – A Muslim woman garbed in a head-to-toe swimsuit — dubbed a "burquini" — may have opened a new chapter in France's tussle between religious practices and its stern secular code. Officials insisted Wednesday they banned the woman's use of the Islam-friendly suit at a local pool because of France's pool hygiene standards — not out of hostility to overtly Muslim garb. Under the policy, swimmers are not allowed in pools with baggy clothing, including surfer-style shorts. Only figure-hugging suits are permitted.

Nonetheless the woman, a 35-year-old convert to Islam identified only as Carole, complained of religious discrimination after trying to go swimming in a "burquini," a full-body swimsuit, in the town of Emerainville, southeast of Paris. She was quoted as telling the daily Le Parisien newspaper that she had bought the burquini after deciding "it would allow me the pleasure of bathing without showing too much of myself, as Islam recommends. For me this is nothing but segregation," she said.

The issue of religious attire is a hot topic in France, where head-to-toe burqas or other full-body coverings worn by some Muslim fundamentalists are in official disfavor. France is home to western Europe's largest Muslim population, estimated at 5 million, and Islam is the nation's second religion after Roman Catholicism.

A 2004 law banning the wearing of Muslim head scarves at public schools sparked fierce debate. That legislation also banned Jewish skullcaps and large Christian crosses in public classrooms. French lawmakers recently revived the issue of Muslim dress with a proposal that the burqa and other voluminous Muslim attire be banned.

President Nicolas Sarkozy, a conservative, backs the move, saying such garb makes women prisoners. The "burquini" covers the arms to the wrists and the legs to the ankle and has a hood to cover neck and hair.

An official in charge of swimming pools for the Emerainville region, Daniel Guillaume, said the refusal to allow the local woman to swim in her "burquini" had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with public health standards. "These clothes are used in public, so they can contain molecules, viruses, et cetera, which will go in the water and could be transmitted to other bathers," Guillaume said in a telephone interview. "We reminded this woman that one should not bathe all dressed, just as we would tell someone who is a nudist not to bathe all naked," he said.

Guillaume said France's public health standards require all pool-goers to don swimsuits for women and tight, swimming briefs for men — and caps to cover their hair. Bathers also must shower before entering the water. Guillaume said Carole had tried to file a complaint at a local police station, but her request was turned down as groundless.

Carole told the daily Le Parisien she would protest with the help of anti-discrimination groups.

Emerainville Mayor Alan Kelyor said he could not understand why the woman would want to swim in head-to-toe clothes. "We are going back in civilization," he said by telephone. Women have fought for decades for equal rights with men, he said. "Now we are putting them back in burqas and veils."

The suits have a clear market.

Women "jump on the occasion so they can swim with their families. Otherwise, they end up staying on the beach and watching," said Leila Mouhoubia, who runs an online site from France that specializes in the sale of Islamic swimsuits. Sales, she said, are strong. "I think it's forbidden (in France) because it presents an image of the Muslim woman (and) they have prejudices against Muslims," she said by telephone. "They want women to be undressed."

Mouloud Aounit, head of the anti-racism group known as MRAP, said the decision to ban Carole from the pool appeared fair, since pool authorities were observing regulations. But Aounit lamented that the incident was likely to fuel religious tensions. "The rules must be the same for everybody, regardless of the color of their skin or their religion," Aounit said. "The concern I have is that this case will again lead to stigmatization of the Muslim population in France."

The all-body suits, worn regularly by some women in Muslim countries, are growing popular in the West. They can be seen on female Muslim lifeguards on Australian beaches, in the United States and various European countries, from the Netherlands to Sweden — which OKed them after two women won discrimination cases last year."

Once again, I'm blown away at the French - and in general, the world - attitude toward Muslims. We prove time and again that we are as unworthy as any could be of our own religion. Where is the tolerance that we should show others as citizens of the world?

Sadly, most people are not citizens of the world but unwitting pawns to the idea of nationalism. I love being an American, I love living in the United States, but I do not agree with the "our way or the highway mantra more often heard than not. It is wrong to believe that people who emmigrate from the Middle East or other regions are less entitled to their beliefs and cultural mores than ours. We would raise a right royal fuss if we were given such an attitude somewhere else, but it is seemingly okay for us to do this to others.

Wrong.

One reason I cannot support organised religion is this intolerance toward all other religions - even those that are under the same broad umbrella as yours but not speicifically the same! So even though there are so many Christians in the United States, a country founded on religious freedom, we still find that the Jehovah's Witnesses don't like the Southern Baptists, the Mormons don't care for the poligamist Mormons, the Reborn Christians don't care for the Episcopalians, and Roman Catholics don't like anyone! Does that make any sense?

I find all the fringe groups a bit distasteful: the crazy people in Waco, the uneducated fools involved in the Oklahoma City bombing, the polagamist Mormons (I personally could care less if they want to have multiple wives; it is the reasoning, the treatment of the wives and the open pediphilia that bothers me), the KKK (yes, religious fervor has a role in that disgusting group) and of course the other religions' fanatics, such as the Taliban and Al Quaeda. I'm sure that Judaism has its fringe groups, most likely prevalent in the disputed territories of the West Bank, Jerusalem and neighbouring areas, but they don't seem to have the universal or newsworthy presence that the others have.

But this article above... well. Are we going to be fair and tell people you cannot wear your cross or Star of David or Wiccan symbols? Yogs can no longer be practiced as a form of exercise because suddenly we might have a rash of Eastern religions taking over? If women of the Islamic faith wish to wear burquinis and burquas, where is it anyone else's place to pass judgment on them?

More metal midgetry: 'Emerainville Mayor Alan Kelyor said he could not understand why the woman would want to swim in head-to-toe clothes. "We are going back in civilization," he said by telephone. Women have fought for decades for equal rights with men, he said. "Now we are putting them back in burqas and veils." '

We did not put anyone in anything. The women made a choice. You would fight for women to make the choice to wear less (how delightfully self-serving) but you would take away a person's choice to wear something you don't like.

I'm quite right in saying that is just stupid.